Successful SaaS Solutions Start with a Minimum Product Viability (MPV)
Achieving a successful SaaS Business starts not with a perfectly formed SaaS platform, but by achieving a Minimum Product Viability (MPV) SaaS platform. That is the essential first must have goal for any successful SaaS business. But an MPV SaaS solution is not just a working model: but one that delivers the real value proposition which your SaaS solution promises.
The ‘real SaaS MPV goal’ is not often fully understood as to what it must achieve to avoid pre-launch failure for SaaS businesses. Too often SaaS MPV’s are half hearted aspirational “nice to have features. Compared to a successful SaaS solution of ‘must have’s’ SaaS solutions. That’s what makes a successful SaaS business, they always start with a robust MPV.
Business leaders’ are often told that shifting to a SaaS model ‘build it and they will come mentality,” but they won’t come, if you don’t achieve a robust SaaS MPV. You won’t compete within your chosen market. Just being an online SaaS product does not make your business achieve success. If the SaaS MPV does not actively compete, then it will not succeed. So MPV is often a misunderstood or omitted market entry goal. MPV means your software as a service actually wins target audience customers making you a player within the market. Once you get this right then you can look at your SaaS pricing model.
Launching without a MPV
Too many companies start trading without achieving a clear MPV. They build it, launch their marketing and sales plan and start trading and hope. But their SaaS fails to deliver to their target audiences. Pressure on SaaS businesses is to get there quickly. That often leads to trials which do not convert. Channel partners do not actively resell, Uncertain customer acquisition plans and confused pipeline management. All resulting in SaaS metrics such as cost per customer acquisition continually increasing. That leads to high burn rates of cash and pressure on leaders to chase customers. Pressure to play catch-up replaces ensuring the SaaS delivers its fundamental goal, that of real tangible value to the customer.
The alternative risk in not looking to achieve a robust MPV is that effort, resources and personal energy are lost in developing the wrong elements of the SaaS business. Rushing to market, often means that the marketing and sales drivers forward leaving the core offering behind. This leads to over promising and a confused set of priorities. for the company. Resulting in leaders trying and patch together into a coherent product or service offering.
SaaS Require Robust MPV
SaaS MPV metrics must be clear. MPV must be a tangible goal with a viable product offering. If you take your service online is must do more than just exist. Now I am not saying it needs to be perfect. But a over-polishing a SaaS solution is one of those very dangerous assumptions we will come onto shortly, but simple migration of a product online is not a SaaS MPV.
For Minimum Product Viability to be achieved, a SaaS solution must successfully compete within its market(s). It must win new customers for it to achieve MPV status. Too often the model of lower cost looks good on paper, especially to the accountant, investors and banks. Which is supported by competitor analysis and trend analysis but without any evidence of actually being able to win target segment customers.
Don’t Hit and Hope with SaaS
The built and they will come mentality often leads to the knee jerk reaction from companies to offer discounts to customers to gain traction right from the start. The downside of that tactic is that the predicted customer revenue targets aren’t met if you give it away. Giving it away also means that customers do not value your SaaS offering resulting in:-
1. Poor customer quality
2. Low engagement and low retention rates.
3. Poor product development which damages the core SaaS product.
4. False success metrics driving poor service and innovation
5. A SaaS business with short term mindset
The other major challenge of giving it away on day one to gain traction is that once the opening price perception is set it is difficult to reset. Initial target audiences are typically early adopters who usually are your target premium customers, they expect certain valuable features within the MPV that tie them in, which if not immediately available mean that they will abandon the SaaS solution. It is also difficult to recover your market or premium market price unless you have large marketing budget to support the opening offer discount.
Measuring MPV requires leaders to not only check it works (and that is never a given with IT) but also that it achieves MPV as an offering. Does it do what it needs to do for the customer.? Does it meet the complete customer requirement of the value proposition? So do not just focus on the pure IT but on the whole value proposition to measure the MPV status. Test it with pilot groups, measure not only it looks good, but does it replace what they were doing? If not it needs to do more.
Over-polishing your SaaS MPV
I have worked with several SaaS start-ups and migration SaaS brands who face the eternal problem of over polishing their MPV. Failing to set a MPV goal with a timeline means that many companies keep playing and tinkering with their SaaS product rather than get it out there.
The challenge is that everyone has thoughts, features and layouts they want to see, so the more people involved the more the pull and push from 3rd parties to meet their expectations or perceptions. The nature of every increasing committees is to tinker and therefore delay. Continuing to over-polish is a major issue for many SaaS businesses. They ask too many people to review it and each has a view, but continual reviews and tweaks delay the acid test ill it work in teh real world.
Everyone has an opinion and no matter how valuable it is the MPV goal must define the MINIMUM, not the optimum or the ideally would like. These should be in secondary releases onwards as upgrades and add-ons. An MPV must to have a launch deadline in place with clarity of what that SaaS will deliver and how it will be upgraded over time to meet specific needs. A soft Beta test launch to a target audience will test and validate the MPV objective, which if you have followed the classic MPV creation model (below) will enable you to get to market with a credible SaaS solution.
What makes a successful MPV? One that delivers the SaaS value propositions’ core elements. When entrepreneurs or leaderships teams are building their SaaS businesses model they must start by thinking through what are the core elements we MUST HAVE rather than those we would LIKE to HAVE. Those core elements must engage with their target audiences both directly and through whatever channels to market they intend to operate with or through.
That MPV, what you go to market with to prove the concept and launch your business with has to contain the MUST HAVE‘s that both challenge and disrupt the market your SaaS model is entering, if it is to succeed.
So the MPV must be robust, not aspirational. It must do deliver the core value proposition, not be full of we will do this at a later stage. The phrase “You never get a second chance to make a great first impression.” Defines the need for a robust SaaS solution MPV within any market. If it is not robust in delivering those core value proposition elements then it won’t challenge or disrupt the existing players whether they be physical or SaaS competitors. Lets look at how to create a Robust MPV.
Create A Successful SaaS Business
1a. Firstly identify the success criteria that will indicate whether or not the SaaS solution will be successful
1b. Then identify the business needs of the sector today and over the long-term.
2a. Map out the customer / user journey(s)
2b. Then segment the core user groups (called the actors)
2c. Clarify the journey end point (end goal)
2d. Then mark all actions the user must take to meet that end goal, and then simplify them as much as possible, less is more.
3a. Write down the action the user completes when using the product
3b. Write down the pain points for each action
3c. Write down the gains for each action
3d. Summarise the pains and gains into opportunity statements
3e. Use “How might we” statements or a similar method to summarise the pains and gains you have identified, prioritise and
4a. Use opportunity statements to finalise your core “must have” features and ensure they are built into a coherent MPV model.
4b. Provide a breakdown of the features to include in the product roadmap, identifying each feature element.
4c. Use a prioritisation matrix (or similar method) to prioritise features creating a complete MPV customer journey to build and launch with.
4d. Identify other features to be launched as 2nd phase onwards and use target customer audience or beta test launch feedback to validate these feature in subsequent launches.
4e. Identify Key SaaS metrics including UX, channel partner and disputer effect metrics to measure your MPV launch with.
Successful SaaS
Get your MPV wrong and it is difficult to make a comeback. Understanding your core audience (it may not be big but it must be defined and reachable). Many SaaS MPV are done below the radar, with soft launches to target audiences either directly or through selected or exclusive channel partners to provide validity of model and ensure MPV has been achieved.
Going big too soon is often appealing but rarely successful. Think about achieving viability then scaleability with a proven model to solve a tangible issue for a target audience and you are more likely to succeed. Research your target audiences’ specific needs and plan points and ensure that your MPV focuses on delivering the results they need, rather than trying to do too much. Add value and then keep on adding more value is what makes a successful MPV for a SaaS business.
Back in 2012, I wrote an article (on this blog) about the potential future of business in the internet age, called The Internet Tsunami. Back in 2012 as we emerged from the infancy of the internet I stated that the internet would become a major business channel for all business sectors not just music and insurance. It was no longer a passing fad. Back in late 1990’s we saw the internet emerge from having been a research tool to something which people could experience through to the dot.com boom of the early 2000’s when money flooded in to this emerging market but the infrastructure and customer engagement platforms were not ready preventing online becoming more than a side show for businesses. So here is how to create a successful SaaS strategy and pricing model for your SaaS business in 2021.
After the financial crisis of 2007/8 as the economic bounce-back accelerated change in the economy opening the door to the internet age and it began to take shape. My article in March 2012 suggested that what we were seeing the beginnings of the permanent change across all sectors and markets, it was not just Amazon replacing CD music shopping, but that the world was going to change. So lets look at how to create a successful SaaS strategy and pricing model
The SaaS Tipping Point
Now that the technology tipping point has occurred and it has become the dominant global force in driving consumer behaviour. This paradigm shift is when markets move in response to macro factor drivers. For companies going too early with any trend can lead them to commit in concrete to a technology which leaves them left behind as the internet evolves for example Friends Reunited: provided no interaction and on-going relationship creation, as Facebook found is what makes a successful online social media platform.
Go too late, and you miss the market shift and find you have been left behind with disastrous consequences. Comet sold electrical white goods and collapsed with over 20% of the UK market share through its 200 stores, but refused to see the move online for these goods by younger consumers, while Amazon at the time had already achieved 8% of the white goods market with no physical shops.
If you can see a trend you have already missed it. Once the tipping point in a sector then you are playing catch-up. So over the last 9 years the internet has not just become another channel to market for many goods, it has become the dominant channel for many sectors most noticeably in retail, but is now almost ubiquitous, impacting upon every market.
The ability to take products and services online is now in full force with organisations inventing themselves, reinventing themselves as online (SaaS) business models. For many this is a result of a number of key factors, not least is about keeping up with your customers and the competition. But, other key factors such as the reduction in cost of developing online services, as well as the ability to upgrade services quickly in response to rapidly changing or evolving customer demands are other positive drivers of moving online.
Shifting to a SaaS Business Model
Making the shift to go to a SaaS solution is a strategic one, it should be based upon a clear strategic assessment of the market and customer needs and carefully planned out in a detailed business plan. SaaS is not just moving your products online, going digital. That is an important step but moving to a SaaS solution model it is completely new way of thinking about you deliver, to whom and how.
SaaS solutions start by working out what the future will look like and if you can do more online than as you are today. From that strategic assessment if SaaS solution is the way of delivering real underlying value to your future (and current) customers then you need to develop your Minimum Product Viability model to move your business into the SaaS world. Click here to learn more about how to set up a Minimum Product Viability (MPV) by clicking this link here.
Software As A Service – SaaS Solution
Software as a Service (SaaS) solutions are now common across all sectors replacing manually made service offerings. For many businesses replacing, upgrading and being able to compete within their sector requires companies to move to SaaS offerings. Either bespoke designed SaaS from scratch using in-house or outsourced technicians or tailored from white label sector providers. Offering a SaaS solution to a market is not just a shift change in what an organisation offers but a whole new way of thinking.
First: Create A Successful SaaS Strategy
SaaS though is more than just simple a move online. It requires a different way of thinking from traditional models. The changing nature of customer engagement, moves from the physical meeting to the online engagement, that requires companies to think and act differently. The nature of the service also changes as it becomes totally arms length customer centric. Customers choose when and what they want to use of the service (for example over 2,700 UK people did their tax returns on Christmas day in 2019, with over 30,000 doing them over the Christmas holiday period in 2019), this requires companies to resource supporting users when they need it not when you are open.
Business to consumer SaaS models need to support consumers with planned engagement and support channels as well as developing SaaS loyalty strategies in place to retain and develop customer segments. For B2B SaaS models working across partner channels puts a set of different requirements in place in accessing target audiences through integrated service offerings through integrated software .
SaaS behaviours also require business to measure very different metrics to be successful, many of which are new to companies not used to SaaS solutions, but if you do not measure them SaaS will fail to deliver the results you expect. Here are some of the key areas for SaaS businesses to monitor and drive decision making from.
SaaS Solutions: Being a Disrupter
Disrupting any market requires your SaaS offering to target and penetrate precise target segments and disrupt the existing market. Focus on measuring the disruption your new offering is causing. Are you reaching your core target audience with your new offering and taking customers from the competition, or protecting your vulnerable customers with you new offering. Disruption is about changing people’s perception and behaviour patterns. So it is important to measure the existing behaviours and their new behaviours using the SaaS solution.
Just shifting your existing customers online maybe a strong defensive strategy if your are the last to move into SaaS, but that is not a disrupter. To disrupt a market you have to do something which changes the game. Changes the structure, the dynamics and the value proposition within the target audience.
SaaS solutions MUST do MORE than just Match Your Off line Offering
SaaS solution need to offer more to customers within their sector. Providing a genuine value-added solution must be designed and built into the SaaS solution. Either at the start or as a planned upgrading rollout plan. If your Minimum Product Viability (MPV) assessment provides compelling evidence of the potential to move online, just migrating offline to online business activities will not succeed. SaaS businesses must find, connect and engage with customers in a completely different way than their offline equivalents, even if they are the same customer base being migrated across by the company. That customer experience must reflect the culture and value which the audiences has and wants to experience for it to be successful. SO SaaS businesses must actively drive engagement, create direct and indirect communities, offer advice and support and actively monitor audience segments value experiences to enable SaaS to add real value to target segments.
Building more into a SaaS solution can be undertaken at low (or no cost) if planned in at the design stage. `Good forward thinking strategically thought out SaaS solutions can design in actual and anticipated customer needs at low or no cost. Building into the SaaS platform forward evolution so that they can evolve in response to customer evolving and emerging demand, overcome competition short-term and long-term responses and to life-time evolution needs.
Being able to add in and evolve a SaaS solution to a complete solution is essential so it offers a complete long-term solution, not just a quick fix. That requires several micro launches, (evolutions) to meet theses needs and to enable the SaaS solution to add more value (value proposition).
Measuring why, where and who is using the site for what as well as forums and associated features will tell you the full value you could, should and must offer. Often support functions such as help desks, brochures, technical information, upgrading options and associated activities are always areas where doing more can be seen, but only if you measure them! What about training and certification of users and channel partners, and the whole range of other activities which these intranet offerings can also provide?
SaaS Success: Target the Right Segments.
Moving to SaaS is not a straight line. Build it and then just sit back and watch customers come onboard, is how SaaS is sold to CEO’s in shifting their business to a SaaS solution. But that is not how SaaS adoption works. Adoption curves matter. So identifying who, why and when segments will move over to a SaaS offering is vital for success. Being able to anticipate and plan around customer acquisition by customer target segment must be planned out and executed in dissectible phases.
One major challenge is that the key drivers of a SaaS solution within an organisation may well come from specific user segment(s) within an organisation. Identifying the pain points within a target audience is therefore vital. Who will adopt your technology when is an important element in designing your market entry strategy.
Saas Adoption Curve Modelling
Who are the core target segments that SaaS solution should be targeted at? This central question is often lost in the generic answer everyone! But it is not. SaaS solutions must add value to everyone, but they must be focused on converting target businesses strategic target audience. That focus must be at the heart of the SaaS solution design and implementation, if you win more great but your focus is to move the brand’s customer base.
For success SaaS solution moves the brand’s position, its profitability and its performance by acquiring new higher value customers. Higher value customers in both B2B and B2C environments for mainstream players are usually found higher up the adoption stream. So laggards find growth in volume and value in the late majority (see below for market adoption curve and total market size modelling). Late majority players can already win downstream laggards but need to expand by either growing with their sector or by moving into early majority customer segments, and likewise early majority customers look at high value (but smaller total volume) early adopters.
Adoption Curve and Total Market Segmentation
The key measurements here are to identify the precise target segments you intend to win, and measure that as your metrics of success. Do not just measure total customers as this can inflate your SaaS success. While measuring total numbers always looks good. It may not be profitable growth and can often lead to SaaS platforms being pulled into chasing total numbers not focusing on developing profitable long-term customers. This is typically seen when a new SaaS platform has to buy its customer growth, so people see the growth as success, but it can be burning through their cash reserves as they have focused on the wrong metrics.
Profitable target customers support growth of a SaaS solution. This must be measured to see if the strategic goal is being achieved.
SaaS Strategic Pricing Models
For a SaaS business to succeed it needs to get its pricing right, there is no bigger strategic decision to take. There are several ways to price your SaaS solution which we can break down into 6 key models and a couple of common variants. Choosing your pricing model will reflect the market you are in, your strategic business objective, the nature of the solution you’re providing and the designed rollout of your SaaS value proposition solution you are offering.
1. SaaS Flat Rate Pricing
The most common and simple, often replacing a previous non-SaaS solution. It is simple and effective, easy to use price to incentives by allowing target audiences to compare the value proposition. The difficulty in this model is that it is difficult to add value to target audiences, such as high-use or high-value customers.
Some SaaS pricing models then try to add premium models to this, by adding a second solution to enable extra features and pricing to the offering, but this often creates technical challenges and is difficult to migrate customers across to.
2. SaaS Usage Based Pricing
Usage based pricing is popular and provides an ideal way to price your SaaS solution. It enables pricing scaling, the more your company use, the more you value you consume, the more you pay. It allows low cost acquisition and then scale-up in pricing towards target audiences. Ideal for B2B solutions, usage based pricing works well as disrupter within a business service sector.
This also enables additional levels to be added and funded through growth as usage drives demand. Usage based pricing also reduces and often removes barrier to entry as the SaaS platform accounts for a wide-range of customer segments, from new entrants through to high demand heavy user groups.
Usage based pricing does have some limitations. The moving up levels (and down) can be challenging for customers to see what they get for the price they pay. The key area of concern for a SaaS Solution using this model is that monthly revenue, a key metric will vary and is therefore not popular within the sector as predictable revenue is often a core demand for investors.
3. SaaS Multiple Tiered Pricing Models
One of the most effective models as it allows the SaaS platform to be priced to target audiences using tiered pricing. Tailoring different packages around target audiences enables the SaaS platform you can appeal to multiple audiences. This has a key secondary advantage in revenue generation as you maximise revenue across all channels to market. It also allows simple clear and honest upselling opportunities as well as add-on pricing with new features/levels being added in response to changing demands.
Key factors to be be aware of here is having too many pricing levels. Just because you can does not mean you should. 3 is optimum and 5 is often seen as maximum, the more you add the higher the abandonment rates and the lower the effective of marketing campaigns.
The idea of dynamic pricing, too many tiers leads towards a platform that looks like usage pricing which dilutes and degrades the tiered pricing focus on key target segments, vital for strategic success of a SaaS solution. The other downsides of too many packages is that trying to over target segments damages the focus on the tiered model, confusing customers through too many choices and damaging price effectiveness by not reflecting tiered pricing to deal with heavy use customer groups.
4a. SaaS User Pricing
The fourth pricing model moves away form company wide pricing to the end user. This model is ideal for many sectors where simple pricing wins customers over. Wether that is a fixed annual or monthly fee, its simplicity and logic engages with SaaS platforms whose offering of a direct pricing model allows customers to sign-up as individuals.
User pricing is popular as it is predictable in income and scales easily with numbers. This predictability makes it popular but needs to be internally measured by usage by individuals to see what value they generate from the platform.
While simplicity makes it popular it is also its major limitation as a pricing model. Per user charges means that there is little opportunity to get group buy-in as one person can use the platform and share the results. The inability to signup whole teams as one limits routes to market through channel partners. It also means that churn becomes a major factor as it is harder to control churn as people relate use to value as an individual.
4b. SaaS Active User Pricing
Is a variant of of user pricing but works by charging for people actually using the SaaS platform. It is seen as excellent value for money as it removes risk for purchasers as sign-up does not cost. This drives engagement and adoption as it is only usage which is charged. People can sign-up but do not pay until they actually use the platform, it is ideal for enterprise business models.
The downside of active user pricing is that it is difficult to grow outside specialist enterprise areas. Often premium priced as a live service it is difficult to encourage widespread adoption with teams or across sectors. For example accounting software is great in the finance department but off limited value elsewhere in a business.
5. SaaS Per Feature Pricing
A more recently developed and currently popular variation on the user based pricing model theme is called per feature pricing. Customers of businesses pay a subscription fee, a base fee with limited functionality which achieves MPV and adds real value and then differing premium priced add-on features which either replace the need for multiple upgrade options or allow a SaaS solution to adapt with its own specialist feature cost model expansion.
This model encourages customers to upgrade to unlock additional functionality which allows segment specialisation and directly relates those functions to direct costs. Think about gaming models where users buy the core game but then trade up by buying additional features. This per feature pricing model allows sites to know their operating cost models and revenues of the base model, and enables cost scaling for bespoke areas that may take significant resources to develop. Sub-segmentation by feature is popular as it allows cost to value to be direct and then reverse rolled back into the SaaS site as it evolves as a cost-free upgrade.
The key challenges of cost per feature pricing is that SaaS solutions can be pulled by small segments away from their core model to meet these minority groups. The other challenge of per feature pricing is that of customer frustration as key features are at a premium.
6. SaaS Freemium Pricing
Saving one of the most popular and misunderstood to last is the freemium model. This model allows customers limited functionality the SaaS solution platform for free. This enables mass adoption through any market of the SaaS platform with a clear level of functionality which buys users in. It is ideal for large volume platforms such as social media channels as the model removes the key hurdle to volume customer acquisition.
Freemium gets customers bought in for nothing as there are no barriers to entry and this supports rapid expansion through and across channels, but it does limit value adding at the freemium level. Encouraging customers to trade up and use the additional chargeable features is teh real challenge
Predicated revenue planning is the real looser here for companies. This makes it less popular with funding parties (and accounts departments) as conversion to revenue is undefined within this model. To fund freemium SaaS models multiple funding systems are often adopted, such as smart algorithm advertising which is an ideal way to fund expansion.
With freemium sites high churn rates and low loyalty rates are major drain factors to this model, both of which make traction and the ability to encourage customers to upgrade difficult. Funding to support the core functionality is often under pressure to keep it developing and engaging with the volume of its core customer base.
Summary: Successful SaaS Strategy Business Looks Like Today
SaaS solutions are now mainstream to nearly all business and customer segments. Being mainstream though does not mean that the risks have disappeared, in many ways they have increased as expectations have accelerated as audiences demands have risen.
Whichever SaaS pricing model you adopt understand that they all come with risks which need to be understood and actively managed within your planning.
SaaS solutions must be part of a strategic process for leaders to understand and deal with. One area that many leaders do not fully appreciate is that building an experienced SaaS team around them is a prerequisite for success.
Learn more read further blogs or get in touch to see how I can assist you.
Being focused and clear on where you are going is vital as a director. Clarity of direction with a clear focus with your business puts leaders in control of their business. Being in control ultimately ensures leaders are successful. But taking control is one of the biggest issues leaders face. Knowing where to start, and even how to start making positive changes to your business can be a real challenge.
Leaders Mentoring Needs
Successful directors must be able to create and make change happen. Making change is essential to make their company able to meet demands and expectations of its customers. So leaders must become change makers within their organisation to make it and keep it successful. Knowing how and when to make what changes is the many skills which leaders need to develop. Being able to see the need, communicate it and deliver change is a major skillset senior people need to develop. Leaders have to be able to move outside their existing comfort zone in taking people through change..
Successful change makes a real bottom-line difference to your business success. But to go through change is often painful and difficult. This is where an experienced mentor makes a real difference.
A good mentor is someone who has not only been through change several times, but someone who also has seen it across multiple markets and with different types of people. A good mentor gets to know you as a person and gets to understand the real challenges the mentees are facing. That’s why leaders find mentors who support them achieve their goals. Richard Gourlay has been mentoring leaders for over thirty years.
The difference between Telling Mentoring and Coaching
Mentoring is the process which supports leaders develop their skills by working with them in developing the mentees skills. Mentoring is a specific set of development skills where a mentor shares their knowledge, skills and/or experience, to help another to develop and grow.
To see how mentoring sits between telling and coaching, see the graphic below. Mentoring is more effective than telling as it enables leaders to develop their skills through their real-life experiences. By talking through situations leaders learn and develop their skills, rather than being told what to do. Coaching on the other hand walks people through situations and provides guidance on specific issues. The greta advantage of mentoring is therefore that the mentee learns how to deal with business challenges rather than being coached through situations. About Richard Gourlay Mentor
Over the last 30 years I’ve worked with hundreds of business owners. Working with micro-businesses through to international PLC’s and I’ve identified that there are some key common factors that successful leaders do which ensure their success, while other business owners struggle to keep their heads above water. What I’ve learnt is that there are simple and logical steps that successful people undertake. These steps which make that something different in what they do delivers real results in taking the guess work out of their business success. This is the basis of effective mentoring.
I’ve spent years refining those key steps into a programmes of business mentoring for senior people. My mentoring programmes support personal growth. Mentoring creates bite-size action planning that develop people in their role. My director mentoring programmes enable people to develop their personal and professional skills. We develop key outcomes into sessions which develop a clear programme of development. Each programme starts by identifying mentees core strengths and areas to work on. This is then developed into a bespoke plan of what they need to do differently to be even more successful in their role.
My Director mentoring programme
Taking the guesswork out our business success requires people making simple steps over time. Mentoring support is usually a monthly process of development. Each step is small and measured, typically spread over a monthly. People are held to account to make the change they want to see. By making each step happen leaders grow themselves and their team as their confidence and competence grows. Our bespoke programmes enable business owners to work ON their business effectively rather than just spending more time IN their business.
Below are some of the key things to consider in taking the guess work out of your business success:-
1. Mentoring: Know What to Work ON
Knowing what you need to focus on makes a huge difference in where to invest your energy and resources. I’m a huge fan of the leadership culture of working ON it not IN it. If you are not working ON your business then how is it going to improve? It is the leader who must make the business stronger.
How will you, or your business be ready and able to face tomorrow’s challenges without making change happen? But you need to know what is important to work on within your business, and why! That’s where mentoring supports you grown and develop as a leader.
2. Directors: Why you are working ON your business
The only certainty in business is Change. Today that has never been truer. The pace of change in every market has, is, and will change at an ever faster rate. Changing market conditions, to customer demands, through to employee expectations have all created additional extra pressures on leaders to respond quicker. Accelerated changes within the business environment require leaders to adapt quicker and more effectively.
How should you respond to those changes? Fast enough and effectively enough to take full advantage of those changes, without loosing site of where you are going and why. If making change is a challenge or if you have ever wondered how to make positive changes, then my mentoring programme will enable you to understand why and how to make change happen. Working on your business is the most valuable actively any leader can undertake and puts you in the driving seat of your business.
3. Director Mentoring: Where to Grow
Every business owner wants to grow turnover, profitability or customer base, but how is the important question. Where is tomorrow’s growth coming from and how can you access it effectively and efficiently? This step-by-step mentoring programme will show you where growth is going to come from and how you can effectively access it.
What is good profitable growth rather than just growth. An important distinction which leaders need to recognise that all growth is not good.
4. How to Make Change Happen
Doing what we’ve always done is the natural default behaviour that people fall back into despite best intentions. Change does not happen unless you make change happen. Mentoring, working with an external advisor is an effective way to develop yourself offline from your existing line management structure. Being able to discuss personal skills development with an external mentor allows people a “safe space” to bounce ideas around, share frustrations and concerns enables people to think through making change happen.
Change is always easy to talk about, but harder to actually deliver. Change is always necessary to achieve success. This step-by-step mentoring programme enables you to create the right changes, which deliver the right results for success. Every step involves a single simple activity which is supported by a template in a workbook to create your success.
5. Director mentoring Reduce the Risks
Taking your business from where it is today to where you want it to be tomorrow is essential to keep your business competitive and successful. But change involves taking risk, but there is an even bigger risk in not making change. Director mentoring programmes reduce these risks by evaluating and balancing the risk factors effectively. Each step is focused around making sensible pro-active decisions which have been tried and tested.
Being mentored by an experienced independent director allows you to talk through ideas and thoughts with a neutral advisor . An experienced mentor provides a sounding board for director decision making and will challenge your assumptions prior to you making a decision. This reduces risk and allows a director to talk through scenarios and likely consequences. This puts risk reduction and mitigation in place to manage and overcome those risks. Being mentored therefore provides confidence and certainty in decision-making.
Taking the risk out of your business success is all about taking small, simple but highly effective steps. Steps, sometimes small, but always forward move the business in the direction you want it to go. I have designed personalised mentoring programmes to fit every type of person and business by size and sector and at every stage of its development.
Short bite size learning, on face to face or remote sessions support leaders lead successfully. I design a mentoring format with clear models (including templates) suitable to each leaders specific needs. I then bespoke design it to enable you to achieve your success. Supporting your personalised mentoring programme are emails to help support you undertake each step and keep you on track.
So if you want to take the guesswork out of your business success? Then this effective mentoring programme is specifically designed for business owners from start-ups to established businesses owners to take the guess work out of your business success. Our mentoring programmes are a combination of online and face-2-face, depending upon your needs and location.
So get started today, make the first step and contact Richard Gourlay today to start your mentoring journey, just fill in the form below.
What makes a successful company in a market? Is probably the single biggest question a new start-up team must be able to answer. What factors make a successful business has always been a difficult question to answer. So what matters In business for successful start-ups?
The answer has always depended upon who is asking the question!
Unicorn Start-Ups
Dreamers look for unicorns with unique protectable offerings, such as Intellectual Protectable rights, a Unique Selling Proposition (USP). These dreamers will invest in big step start-ups, market disrupters which will change the markets they wish to operate within. Step changing start-ups such as unicorns (are rare hence the name unicorn), but can reshape markets towards these start-ups. Think about Apple and Amazon and what they have done to the markets they operate within. Today these two are the largest (by value) companies in the world today.
Unicorns need a unique angle, a technical platform angle, a defendable IP, or a unique (and defendable) operating platform. Even small start-ups can be unicorns if they can identify and control a unique position. Inside Apple’s early technologies was the British made ARM microchip, which propelled it into be a unicorn. But unicorns are rare, and their window to get established is getting shorter and shorter as competitor awareness and responsiveness is constantly quickening.
Funding Start-Ups
Traditional funders, such as banks want high returns with low risks, and owners who will take all the risk directly, or being prepared to 100% underwrite the banks so called investment. Banks do not like, or take risks, which is uncertainty. Which is why they avoid taking them, unsecured risks are not what banks generally do. So they may support a start-up with a loan based upon a sensible fully costed and robust business plan.
Banks, who are most start-ups first point of call, often provide a poor place for people to start a conversation with about a business start-up. Start-ups looking for financial support, ideas and how to get a business start-up off the ground often left disappointed by the support which they receive.
The risk reduction by definition reduces opportunity; in essence if you remove all the risk you also remove all the opportunity a start-up can achieve. Start-ups often overstate their growth, understate competitor defensive activity and the challenges in getting established. Often start-ups can find better funding through self-funding options, alongside friends and family as stage one seed funding. It is always best to start small, prove your concept and then go out to market for stage 2 funding with a proven pilot under your belt.
Start-Up Entrepreneurs Solve Customers Problems
Entrepreneurs genuinely look at solving an emerging problem, the old adage is:-
“The secret of success is to find a need and fill it, to find a hurt and heal it, to find somebody with a problem and offer to help solve it.” – Robert H. Schuller
While the logical approach of bankers is to ride an existing market wave, true entrepreneurs look to create the wave. They are looking at a problem and identifying the ideal innovative solution for that problem’s resolution.
Researching Successful Businesses
So what makes a successful business model includes a whole variety of factors including the core idea, the experienced team, the market opportunity, market access, competition, scalability (the list goes on and on, depending upon who you are talking with) and what resonates with key stakeholders and target audiences.
Recently Bill Gross, CEO of Idealab decided to research this using his extensive range of business start-ups; 100 of his own, and matched by another 100, across a whole range of sectors. His assessment started by analysing what makes successful businesses. He came across 5 key common factors and he cross-referenced those compared to businesses which have succeeded.
Bill Cross’s 5 keys for a successful business include:-
The Idea: defined and coherent.
The Team: skills, experience, energy and how well connected.
The Business Model: comprehensive worked through covering the business need.
The Funding – access to the right amount of money to achieve its core goals.
The Timing – identifying the market timing to meet target audience needs.
The research results contradicted what many thought would be the results across the 200 companies he and his team analysed. This survey included global names such as Airbnb, Youtube and LinkedIn amongst the 200. His analysis showed that of all the factors which can affect success or otherwise of a business, success really came down to these few key ones. They key factors which are common across all markets, sectors and over time are the defining characteristics for a successful business. But of all the factors one stood out throughout the survey.
Success in Business Start-Ups Relies Upon…
Timing is THE common factor in a successful business at 42%. It is the most common trait of successful company start-ups.
Team came in 2nd, with 32% and the Idea only came 3rd in importance with 28%. The business model, upon which so many advisors focus their attention was 4th at 24% and the funding came in 5th at 14%.
Timing Is Everything for Start-Ups
The quality fo the idea is not as important as timing. Timing, the driving strategic factor can be identified initially through a thorough PESTEL analysis. Timing is the bottomline performance criteria in driving the success factor for a business. PESTEL factors set the macro landscape a business operates and defines the timing of its launch. If the landscape is favourable then a business can succeed. I not, then even if everything else looks great then your chances are far lower, than if you get your timing right.
This shift from build and they will come, the old motto of every good idea, qualifies that statement by saying if the time is right then if you build it they will come.
What Matters in Business for Start-Up Success is therefore Timing
If you look at all successful business over time, then it is always timing that matters. Knowing what to do when really matters for leaders to focus on. The world is full of ideas launched at the wrong time. But get your timing right and the world is your oyster.
From the launch of the internet and the creation of Apple, to the development of low cost airplanes to the launch of low cost holidays, timing is everything.
The Importance of Research for Start-Up Leadership Teams is Vital
Leadership teams need to focus on answering the question their target customers ask, now. Timing is offering the solution the their customers will pay for today, not waiting for it or putting up with second best. If you can answer their needs when they need it, with what they need, then you are on the first rung to find success. Without good timing you are creating products and services no-one (or not enough people want). Timing is equally important for leadership teams to assess if your product / service can be accessed by the target audience.
Successful companies work with their markets to get their timing right in launching products and services that fit within a market. They can challenge existing customers perceptions but they must be the right product at the right time for the right customer if a business is to succeed.
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
Marketing cookies are used to follow visitors to websites. The intention is to show ads that are relevant and engaging to the individual user.
Facebook Pixel is a web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
